assembly
assembly
Ardor v2.0.1e
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Latest Ardor Client: Ardor 2.2.2

Pages: 1 2 3 [All]

Author Topic: Ardor v2.0.1e  (Read 11109 times)

Jean-Luc

  • Core Dev
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +816/-81
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1610
    • View Profile
Ardor v2.0.1e
« on: February 17, 2017, 12:20:33 pm »

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Release 2.0.1e

https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/ardor/downloads/ardor-client-2.0.1e.zip

sha256:

606d6ada92bb9bb3925442ad97c95cea8c61258c963c828e6d7629d9552df9c5  ardor-client-2.0.1e.zip

https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/ardor/downloads/ardor-client-2.0.1e.sh

sha256:

0e73f4b9ff9709c58cf9b54ff70f8db34841835bc39073953fef982a5daed99d  ardor-client-2.0.1e.sh

https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/ardor/downloads/ardor-client-2.0.1e.exe



This is an experimental release for testing only. Source code is not provided.


Change log:

This is a bugfix release, for testnet only.

Added Node JS module, see html/www/js/README.

Multiple bugs fixed and improvements added in client UI, peer networking,
blockchain download.

Removed obsolete news page, added About modal.

This release will force a rescan, deleting blocks after height 11619.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=oypH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Logged
GPG key fingerprint: 263A 9EB0 29CF C77A 3D06  FD13 811D 6940 E1E4 240C
NXT-X4LF-9A4G-WN9Z-2R322

MrV777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +112/-4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 984
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2017, 01:28:49 pm »

Great work!
This is interesting  :)
Quote
Added Node JS module, see html/www/js/README.
Logged
NXT: NXT-BK2J-ZMY4-93UY-8EM9V
NXT nodes: 209.222.98.250, 216.155.128.10

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2017, 01:33:36 pm »

When sending Ardor to new accounts, the form has a public key field. When I enter the public key and click on Fee calculation there is an error message "Public key announcement attachments not allowed for Ardor transactions". So the field for public key should be removed from the form if it's not allowed to be entered?
It's still an issue in 2.0.1e.
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

dhj1965

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +12/-31
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2017, 03:50:45 am »

Hello,

the transaction details windows is showing NXT's "NQT" for amount and fee. I think this should be removed - even if the value references the correct coin.

Best...
dhj.

Logged

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2017, 09:46:59 am »


It was set to 1440 blocks, I think it is still pending. There are no bundlers now that charge that rate but when I sent it the form gave me that fee to pay and I paid it.
I can't check it now since I'm running 2.0.1e which rolled back the database.  I'll see if I can create a poll on the new release.
I created a poll on 2.0.1e on the IGNIS chain.  The calculated fee was 1 IGNIS.  This is correct since poll creation costs 10 ARDR and the bundler rate was 0.1.

I did it again, tx is pending on the Ignis chain. To reproduce:

1) start a bundler with a smaller rate than the market's;
2) getBundlerRates (and minimum fee calculation) now fetches this new rate;
3) stop the bundler to imitate bad network connectivity or attack to make the bundler unreachable;
4) waiting 10 minutes to get into the next 10-minute window doesn't seem to make a difference because:
5) clicking on create a poll (probably other transaction types too), clicking on fee calculation, user will get the stopped bundler's fee, the same as in step 2. User doesn't know the bundler is unreachable and does not adjust the fee higher;
6) user submits transaction and waits and waits and waits but tx doesn't confirm;

In real life someone could start a bundler to pick pending transactions from the mempool if they stay there too long and if it's slightly profitable or subsidize.
Will a much better solution not be for the next best bundler rate to show up after some reasonable time for getBundlerRates (and minimum fee calculation) even though no new bundler in the network was started after the failed bundler had stopped? I've checked and 30 minutes later it's still the stopped bundler's rate being fetched, everyone will now submit txs and pay that inadequate fee.
Can a Replace-by-fee feature be one of solutions to this? I know you said the minBundlerBalanceFXT in the config will mitigate the effect to some extent but it means users have to always keep it high and miss on getting possibly better rates from smaller stake bundlers. Is it possible to make this setting dynamically configured in settings in the browser or somehow allow user to see other rates in the UI fee calculation? Is this a non-issue?
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

Coradan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +21/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 206
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2017, 12:46:07 pm »

Hi,

I have a couple of questions:

First one: If there are no bundlers in IGNIS, who is doing the child block transactions?
At this moment there are no bundlers in Settings/Bundlers, but there are child block transactions...  For example, if I buy one Alias, the transaction is confirmed without Bundlers on list on Settings/Bundlers, or Settings/Bundlers only list the own Bundlers? 

Second one: In Child chains details there is Bundling Rate value, Is this value fixed?  It seems that is the maximum rate that bundlers can set.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2017, 02:30:04 pm by Coradan »
Logged
One more thing: NXT
http://www.nxt.cool

Coradan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +21/-3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 206
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2017, 03:01:04 pm »

Riker answered me in the slack:

He said:

If there are no bundlers not one is doing the bundling. The transaction will stay in the unconfirmed pool until it expires.
Currently, the bundlers page only shows your bundlers not all bundlers.

The chain properties modal shows the best available rate but does not show what the maximum Ardor fee this bundler is willing to pay and if this bundler is even online
Logged
One more thing: NXT
http://www.nxt.cool

ScripterRon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +75/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 523
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2017, 03:19:56 pm »


It was set to 1440 blocks, I think it is still pending. There are no bundlers now that charge that rate but when I sent it the form gave me that fee to pay and I paid it.
I can't check it now since I'm running 2.0.1e which rolled back the database.  I'll see if I can create a poll on the new release.
I created a poll on 2.0.1e on the IGNIS chain.  The calculated fee was 1 IGNIS.  This is correct since poll creation costs 10 ARDR and the bundler rate was 0.1.

I did it again, tx is pending on the Ignis chain. To reproduce:

1) start a bundler with a smaller rate than the market's;
2) getBundlerRates (and minimum fee calculation) now fetches this new rate;
3) stop the bundler to imitate bad network connectivity or attack to make the bundler unreachable;
4) waiting 10 minutes to get into the next 10-minute window doesn't seem to make a difference because:
5) clicking on create a poll (probably other transaction types too), clicking on fee calculation, user will get the stopped bundler's fee, the same as in step 2. User doesn't know the bundler is unreachable and does not adjust the fee higher;
6) user submits transaction and waits and waits and waits but tx doesn't confirm;

In real life someone could start a bundler to pick pending transactions from the mempool if they stay there too long and if it's slightly profitable or subsidize.
Will a much better solution not be for the next best bundler rate to show up after some reasonable time for getBundlerRates (and minimum fee calculation) even though no new bundler in the network was started after the failed bundler had stopped? I've checked and 30 minutes later it's still the stopped bundler's rate being fetched, everyone will now submit txs and pay that inadequate fee.
Can a Replace-by-fee feature be one of solutions to this? I know you said the minBundlerBalanceFXT in the config will mitigate the effect to some extent but it means users have to always keep it high and miss on getting possibly better rates from smaller stake bundlers. Is it possible to make this setting dynamically configured in settings in the browser or somehow allow user to see other rates in the UI fee calculation? Is this a non-issue?
A bundler rate expires after 60 minutes.  The idea is that bundlers are long running.  Even if there was a bundler stopped message, this wouldn't guarantee that the bundler rate would be removed since I suspect that most people stop a node by simply stopping the Java virtual machine without first stopping each bundler and forger.

The 60-minute expiration is an arbitrary value and could be changed.  But it would have to be on a network basis and not a node basis since the renewal message wouldn't be sent until the bundler node decided the rate had expired.

All of the bundler rates are available internally, so an API could be added to retrieve all of them.  I'll ask if this is something that should be added to the UI.
Logged

Jean-Luc

  • Core Dev
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +816/-81
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1610
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2017, 04:01:19 pm »

What we could do is add a checkbox "pay fee in ARDR", which after creating the transaction will automatically use the bundleTransactions API to bundle it too, the user acting as a one-time bundler for his own transaction, paying the minimum fee required in ARDR. Not sure how easy this would be client-side.

Then if there is actually another bundler running, it will bundle this and other child transactions if present, and the resulting child block will be preferred by forgers as having higher total fee, so the one that the user created will just expire. If there are no other bundlers running at that rate, it will be accepted.

Or, for unconfirmed transactions we can add a "Bundle" action. If you are seeing a transaction stay unconfirmed too long, this could be used to create a bundling transactions for it only.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2017, 04:12:39 pm by Jean-Luc »
Logged
GPG key fingerprint: 263A 9EB0 29CF C77A 3D06  FD13 811D 6940 E1E4 240C
NXT-X4LF-9A4G-WN9Z-2R322

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2017, 04:54:04 pm »

Or, for unconfirmed transactions we can add a "Bundle" action. If you are seeing a transaction stay unconfirmed too long, this could be used to create a bundling transactions for it only.

The tx fee has to be paid in ARDR though which user may not have? Can it be made such that anyone can resubmit the same transaction and pay additional fees in CC tokens? If not anyone, then the same user to sign with the same private key?
« Last Edit: February 18, 2017, 04:59:07 pm by lurker10 »
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

Jean-Luc

  • Core Dev
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +816/-81
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1610
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2017, 06:24:42 pm »

Or, for unconfirmed transactions we can add a "Bundle" action. If you are seeing a transaction stay unconfirmed too long, this could be used to create a bundling transactions for it only.

The tx fee has to be paid in ARDR though which user may not have? Can it be made such that anyone can resubmit the same transaction and pay additional fees in CC tokens? If not anyone, then the same user to sign with the same private key?
What this would do is create a one-transaction child chain block, so anyone who has ARDR could do it.
Logged
GPG key fingerprint: 263A 9EB0 29CF C77A 3D06  FD13 811D 6940 E1E4 240C
NXT-X4LF-9A4G-WN9Z-2R322

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2017, 07:17:56 pm »

Or, for unconfirmed transactions we can add a "Bundle" action. If you are seeing a transaction stay unconfirmed too long, this could be used to create a bundling transactions for it only.

The tx fee has to be paid in ARDR though which user may not have? Can it be made such that anyone can resubmit the same transaction and pay additional fees in CC tokens? If not anyone, then the same user to sign with the same private key?
What this would do is create a one-transaction child chain block, so anyone who has ARDR could do it.

Anyone with ARDR may not want to do it because of low or negative profitability.
The requirement for the user to have ARDR for this special case is not unlike the requirement to have NXT to send a MS currency transaction which is one of the problems Ardor is trying to solve. I just want to convince to make usability a little easier if it is possible.
The current design is such that it is unknown if the transaction will be promptly processed with the minimum fee, any measures to help it will be met with enthusiasm.

How about if the UI has two buttons: 'Calculate minimum' and 'Calculate an average' fee (from N number of best rate bundlers), user can decide if it's worth the waiting risk to pay only the minimum or have a better guarantee paying a higher average - but user needs to know how much that average is to avoid overpaying too much?

The 'bundle' button for owners of ARDR tokens is great and should be done too.

For the UI, maybe something like 3 radio buttons (low-normal-high priority) filled with the 3 best successive bundlers' fees to let user make an informed decision on what fee to pay. This is a problem in Bitcoin right now, some client software can't calculate the right fee, there are lots of user complaints.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2017, 07:46:41 pm by lurker10 »
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

blackyblack1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +165/-82
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1763
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2017, 07:43:52 pm »

I just want to convince to make usability a little easier if it is possible.
The current design is such that it is unknown if the transaction will be promptly processed with the minimum fee, any measures to help it will be met with enthusiasm.
Just let the forgers bundle the childchain transactions and we will have best usability without all this rates, fees and bundlers nonsense.
Logged

pirboazo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: +2/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2017, 08:26:28 am »

Hi all,

Where declare bug on the ardor v2.0.1e ?

Pierre
Logged

martismartis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +72/-10
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1234
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2017, 09:45:13 am »

Hi all,

Where declare bug on the ardor v2.0.1e ?

Pierre

Here.
Logged

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2017, 11:03:26 am »

Small UI bug, when transaction amounts are below 0.0001, account's transactions and ledger tabs have 0.0000 and 0.
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

dhj1965

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +12/-31
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2017, 12:34:58 pm »

Small UI bug, when transaction amounts are below 0.0001, account's transactions and ledger tabs have 0.0000 and 0.
I think this just depends on "maximum coin decimal positions" configured in the account settings.

When set to 4 and amount < 0.0001 then - for example - the amount 0.00009999 is shown as 0.0000 (4 decimals)

When increasing the coin decimals, everything looks good.

best...
dhj
Logged

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2017, 02:48:12 pm »

Paying dividends.
Total number of units is 1000, 2 decimals, one user got 100 units, I want to pay him dividends, holding type: asset, 1 per share.
In the dividend payment form, when I put 1 in the Amount per Share, I get "A total of 10000000000000000 6025948372952594856 translation:shares will be distributed among 1 accounts which own a total of 100 shares."
Clicking on Submit "Failed to broadcast transaction: Insufficient balance".
Looks like a bug, as I only want to send out 100 to him, my issuer account has that much.
If I type 2 per share, "A total of 20000000000000000 6025948372952594856 translation:shares will be distributed among 1 accounts which own a total of 100 shares."
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2017, 03:24:31 pm »

Currency minting.
nxt.mint.fee=100000000
the default value in the config.
Transaction from mint.sh was submitted with a 0 fee, won't confirm now.
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

ScripterRon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +75/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 523
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2017, 06:21:50 pm »

Currency minting.
nxt.mint.fee=100000000
the default value in the config.
Transaction from mint.sh was submitted with a 0 fee, won't confirm now.
It is now nxt.mint.feeNQT.  I'll update nxt-default.properties.
Logged

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2017, 07:07:26 pm »

Small UI bug.
All currencies, clicking Exchange opens the exchange booth.
My currencies, clicking on Exchange doesn't do anything.
Can't be sure that it's not an issue of my browser.
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

Riker

  • Core Dev
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +438/-42
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1788
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2017, 07:12:06 pm »

Mac installer ready for testing https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/ardor/downloads/ardor-installer-2.0.1e.dmg
Enjoy !

P.S. there is a known issue with the NXT icon which is still displayed as the application icon, no need to report it.
Logged
NXT Core Dev
Account: NXT-HBFW-X8TE-WXPW-DZFAG
Public Key: D8311651 Key fingerprint: 0560 443B 035C EE08 0EC0  D2DD 275E 94A7 D831 1651

lurker10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +168/-33
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2017, 07:17:50 pm »

Another possible bug.
I have two currencies in my account. When I submit an offer for the second currency, the offer is submitted for first one in the list. Could be my browser again...
Logged
Run a node - win a prize! "Lucky node" project jar: NXT-8F28-EDVE-LPPX-HY4E7

Riker

  • Core Dev
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +438/-42
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1788
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2017, 07:20:13 pm »

I think these are genuine bugs, your browser is doing fine.
Thanks for all the bug reports, these are probably UI problems and usually simple to fix so the more you report the more we get a chance to fix.
Logged
NXT Core Dev
Account: NXT-HBFW-X8TE-WXPW-DZFAG
Public Key: D8311651 Key fingerprint: 0560 443B 035C EE08 0EC0  D2DD 275E 94A7 D831 1651

pirboazo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: +2/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #24 on: February 20, 2017, 06:22:28 pm »

Hi ,

I don't understand why the effective balance is set at NULL after each transaction .
on NXT is not the same feature.

Regards
Pierre
Logged

dhj1965

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +12/-31
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #25 on: February 20, 2017, 06:25:49 pm »

When trying to send a message or pressing the calculate fee button an empty error message area is displayed in the send-dialog and an error is displayed in the main window.



Logged

martismartis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +72/-10
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1234
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #26 on: February 21, 2017, 06:04:38 pm »

Noticed some weird stuff with 2.0.1e desktop client. If I leave it running in maximized screen, after some time it just freezes and stops responding to any mouse click. Need to restore it down, and then everything works as supposed. Anybody else can reproduce this?
Logged

sirpask

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: +9/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #27 on: February 22, 2017, 09:48:00 pm »

hi, anybody can transfer same Ardor, ignis, BTC,EURO,$.... in Ardor test Net, Please?
NXT-NB86-TSMT-RBDU-8Z859

thanks
Logged

dhj1965

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +12/-31
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #28 on: February 23, 2017, 12:40:48 pm »

hi, anybody can transfer same Ardor, ignis, BTC,EURO,$.... in Ardor test Net, Please?
NXT-NB86-TSMT-RBDU-8Z859

There's a special place for this : https://nxtforum.org/testnet/some-testnxt-to-test-asset-exchange

"abctc" will help you quickly...

Best...
dhj
Logged

nagatraju

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #29 on: February 25, 2017, 06:47:18 am »



When will be the Original ARDOR Client released?

What about the assets in ARDOR?
Logged

neofelis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +73/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 564
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #30 on: February 25, 2017, 03:01:48 pm »

My Ardor testnet acct is NXT-TDCQ-46C5-8EFW-9CA7P

Can someone please send me about 10,000 test Ardor please?

Thanks
Logged

neofelis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +73/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 564
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #31 on: February 25, 2017, 03:23:33 pm »

Thank you!
Logged

dhj1965

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +12/-31
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #32 on: February 26, 2017, 10:48:15 am »

Hello,

there's a small problem in account control:

When selecting "per account", it is possible to send the transaction without the any mandatory whitelist account(s). 

No one receives the approval requests for any kind of transaction and so I have locked one of my test accounts as I can't remove the account control again

Logged

danisapfirov

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +17/-7
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #33 on: February 26, 2017, 04:45:26 pm »

I am trying to issue a new asset that needs to be approved by another account. So far tx is unconfirmed.
https://nxtchat.slack.com/messages/developers/files/F4AGWGYKF/
« Last Edit: February 26, 2017, 05:02:31 pm by danisapfirov »
Logged

danisapfirov

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +17/-7
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #34 on: February 27, 2017, 09:42:12 am »

Seems there is a problem with phased transactions. We tested asset issuance and asset transfer approval. Did not work out.

Riker

  • Core Dev
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +438/-42
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1788
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #35 on: February 27, 2017, 09:52:20 am »

Seems there is a problem with phased transactions. We tested asset issuance and asset transfer approval. Did not work out.

Please provide account id, transaction hash and chain
Logged
NXT Core Dev
Account: NXT-HBFW-X8TE-WXPW-DZFAG
Public Key: D8311651 Key fingerprint: 0560 443B 035C EE08 0EC0  D2DD 275E 94A7 D831 1651

danisapfirov

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +17/-7
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #36 on: February 27, 2017, 06:42:39 pm »

Seems there is a problem with phased transactions. We tested asset issuance and asset transfer approval. Did not work out.

Please provide account id, transaction hash and chain

NXT-TPC3-LZPZ-9CTR-4AUR9, fe92a13081bc389679f25cc6648e1534188b0dd7544982c00ac4de52bbec156f IGNIS

Riker

  • Core Dev
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +438/-42
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1788
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #37 on: February 28, 2017, 06:45:58 am »

Seems there is a problem with phased transactions. We tested asset issuance and asset transfer approval. Did not work out.

Please provide account id, transaction hash and chain

NXT-TPC3-LZPZ-9CTR-4AUR9, fe92a13081bc389679f25cc6648e1534188b0dd7544982c00ac4de52bbec156f IGNIS

I started a bundler for Ignis and these transactions are confirmed now in Child Chain Block transaction 29de56420d827ba9a8a1c78b56d238c36a1beaec8e94d8176aa4af6d9019ae03 on Ardor.

The reason they were not picked by other bundlers so far is that because of the phasing they require a 1.1 transaction fee on Ardor and since they pay only 0.01 Ignis the bundlers which accept 0.01 ratio did not pick them up.

You can go ahead and try to approve them now.
Logged
NXT Core Dev
Account: NXT-HBFW-X8TE-WXPW-DZFAG
Public Key: D8311651 Key fingerprint: 0560 443B 035C EE08 0EC0  D2DD 275E 94A7 D831 1651

danisapfirov

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Karma: +17/-7
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 127
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #38 on: February 28, 2017, 06:43:48 pm »

Two strings "Divident History" and
"View Asset Divident History" are not in the translation list.

forkedchain

  • Ex-Staff Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +74/-10
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1190
  • bite me
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #39 on: March 03, 2017, 05:45:20 pm »

something ive noticed for all of the recent releases from both nxt and ardor, i can never log in using firefox/ie/chrome.  always just get an empty blue background with a tiny whitish colored square upper left.  but no boxes in center of screen to enter account info.  i dont use any plugins or anything.  my Win8 is all up to date and i only use windows defender for virus.malware protection.  also windows firewall is turned off as i have win8's network interface set to private network.  when i try to load it, nothing at all shows up in my win cmd box console.

i have to use the autolaunch feature of the app to be able to get into my account, but would like to use regular web browser.  I did a search for "blue screen" and saw some talk of it this past November, but nothing seemed to have come from it
Logged
NXT tips: 2319251 or NXT-8SWM-2224-YKWW-22222

Jean-Luc

  • Core Dev
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +816/-81
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1610
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #40 on: March 03, 2017, 05:51:42 pm »

Make sure you allow cookies from localhost (or the interface you are accessing it from), I have seen this empty blue screen happen when cookies are disabled.
Logged
GPG key fingerprint: 263A 9EB0 29CF C77A 3D06  FD13 811D 6940 E1E4 240C
NXT-X4LF-9A4G-WN9Z-2R322

sirpask

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: +9/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #41 on: March 04, 2017, 12:58:55 am »

a lot of problems with the pass Phrase in Firefox and chat of Ardor. 3 test and the 4... Ubunto Crash.



Logged

sirpask

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: +9/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #42 on: March 05, 2017, 11:19:00 pm »


The rate above is 1250 Satoshi per ARDR. Wouldn't it be better to display it as 0.00001250 (same as on Poloniex - always 8 decimal places) ?
I like 0.00001250, it is more real.
Logged

tiker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
Re: Ardor v2.0.1e
« Reply #43 on: March 07, 2017, 02:35:54 pm »

There's a GUI problem on the peers page which also exists for the NXT client.

Using Windows 7 and Chrome as the browser, view the peers page.  Move the mouse cursor over one of the peer services shown ("CS" for example) which then shows the balloon (bubble or whatever you want to call it showing the full service name).

When the page refreshes to show updated information, move the mouse off off the service.  The balloon remains on the screen.

When changing to other pages now (Dashboard for example) the balloon remains on the screen.  If you happen to have a long list of peers and test this with a peer at the bottom of the list, all of the pages now scroll a long ways down showing nothing until you get to the bubble.

So far, the only way I've found to get rid of the bubble is to log out of the wallet.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [All]
 

elective-stereophonic
elective-stereophonic
assembly
assembly